Munich Re logo
Not if, but how

Explore Munich Re Group

Get to know our Group companies, branches and subsidiaries worldwide.

Hail – An underestimated and growing risk
Compelling reasons to take action
Hail – An underestimated and growing risk
© Marco Kaschuba
    alt txt

    properties.trackTitle

    properties.trackSubtitle

    Anyone who has experienced a severe hailstorm knows the destructive power of this natural hazard. Just a few minutes are enough to decimate an entire harvest, leave dents in cars and seriously damage buildings. Although frequently localised in nature, hailstorms can still cause losses in the billions. A new research institute study that Munich Re is supporting shows that the incidence of severe hailstorms in Europe has increased. It found that the loss potential rose in tandem with the frequency because values have increased and modern building façades are more sensitive to hail. These are compelling reasons to take action.
    Facts and figures: Largest hailstone was found in 2010 in South Dakota, USA

    In places, lumps of ice the size of tennis balls and almost a million damaged buildings: in July and August 2013, record-breaking hailstorms pummelled the German states of North-Rhine Westphalia, Lower Saxony, Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria and Saxony. The typical damage profile included smashed roof tiles that allowed rainwater to leak into buildings, wrecked solar installations, holes punched in façades, and damaged cars. In some parts of the Tübingen-Reutlingen district in the state of Baden-Württemberg, 90% of all buildings were affected. In total, the losses for German motor vehicle and property insurers from the 2013 hailstorms came to more than €4bn, with building damage accounting for €3.1bn of this figure. The largest hailstone measured around 14 centimetres in diameter, setting a new record for Germany. So, what can we learn from events like this?

    Is the incidence of hailstorms increasing because of climate change?

    As part of a doctoral thesis carried out with the support of Munich Re in collaboration with the European Severe Storms Laboratory (ESSL), a new statistical method (“AR-CHaMo”) was developed that uses large-scale observations (so-called reanalysis data) to derive the probability of localised severe thunderstorms for the period 1979 to 2015. This study shows whether hailstorms have actually become more frequent and, if so, in which areas. The results indicated that climate change may be seen as a contributory factor since higher temperatures can explain the increases in humidity established in the thesis.*

    Study using new statistical method indicates that climate change may contribute to more frequent hailstorms

    The results:

    • The most frequent hailstorms with hailstones larger than 2 cm occur in northern Italy, Romania, in the Pyrenees and in the Balkans. Hailstorms occur much more frequently in the south of Germany than in the north.
    Most frequent hail events in Europe occur in northern Italy, Romania, in the Pyrenees and in the Balkans
    • Overall, the number of hail events increased significantly over the 37 years considered. The rise was particularly sharp in northern Italy and on the Adriatic coast, while the increases were smaller in central Europe – in France, the Benelux states and Germany. The study found slight decreases for southwest France and parts of the Iberian peninsula.
    Number of hail events in Europe overall increased significantly over the years 1979-2015
    The study is now to be expanded to include two more elements: the change in future thunderstorm events in Europe will be analysed with the help of climate simulations, and the analysis will also be extended to include North America.

    What needs to be done to prevent losses?

    There are indications that modern buildings, for example in central Europe, are more susceptible to damage from hail. A particular focus is on solar installations, which are often unable to withstand larger hailstones. There is a similar problem with the exteriors of buildings. US insurers are therefore working closely with the IBHS (Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety) Research Center, which is conducting the relevant resistance tests. However, one of the obstacles to any development of hail-resistant installations and materials in the near future is that many countries, Germany included, have no adequate regulations to provide better protection against hailstone sizes greater than 3–4 cm for peripheral installations on buildings.

    Various hailstone sizes and damage profiles
    Modern building façades are especially prone to losses in severe hail events because hailstones frequently strike at an oblique angle due to wind action. This is true, for example, for building exteriors in Germany equipped with modern thermal insulation systems. With such insulated façades, the thin plaster finish is often chipped off by hail and the building is then damaged by wetness. The more complex and costly façades on modern office buildings can also produce major individual losses.

    In Switzerland, where building standards are similar to those in Germany, the proportion of damaged buildings was systematically higher for more modern structures than for older ones: For example, in the canton of Aargau roughly 8% of buildings from the 1940s suffered damage in hailstorms, whereas the figure for buildings constructed after 2000 was 15%.

    A look at Switzerland also shows how resistance to hail can be improved. The Swiss Hail Register (www.hagelregister.ch) was introduced in 2010 in cooperation with homeowner and insurance associations and the Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects. The initiative motivates manufacturers of construction materials and components to have their products tested and certified for hail resistance. The result is a central database with a certification mark for hail-resistant construction. An offshoot of this initiative is also operating in Austria.

    For other countries, including Germany, an initiative of this kind to limit future losses would be highly desirable – not least because of the anticipated consequences of climate change.

    * Rädler, A.T., Groenemeijer, P., Faust, E., Sausen, R., 2018: Detecting severe weather trends using an Additive Regressive Convective Hazard Model (ARCHaMo). J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., DOI:10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0132.1
    Munich Re Experts
    Eberhard Faust
    Eberhard Faust
    Head of Research: Climate Risks and Natural Hazards
    Munich Re (until 01.11.2020)
    Anja Rädler
    Meteorologist, storm expert