New federal legislation may transform risk assessment and underwriting practices

The problem Bill S‑5 is attempting to fix
The federal government has acknowledged the current state of health data sharing in Canada, noting that only 29% of health-care providers can securely share electronic health information outside their practices.1 At the heart of this issue are systemic limitations in how health information is captured and shared. Fax machines remain common, and patients often serve as couriers for their own paper records.
From an underwriting perspective, these challenges contribute directly to:
- Delays in obtaining attending physician statements (APS)
- Incomplete or outdated medical evidence
- Greater reliance on applicant disclosure and paramedical summaries
For insurers more broadly, these challenges can translate into longer wait times and a more complex application experience for customers.
Bill S‑5 aims to address these issues by mandating interoperability standards for health information technology vendors and prohibiting “data blocking”—practices that hinder lawful data sharing.
Dossier santé numérique
Why does this matter?
What is an Electronic Health Record (EHR)*?
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a secure, real-time, patient-centered digital record accessible to authorized users. EHRs are designed to facilitate information sharing among healthcare providers and represent a significant step forward from traditional paper charts. These records enable insurers to:
- Enhance accuracy in risk assessment for underwriting
- Improve underwriting efficiency and turnaround times
- Reduce or eliminate the need for paramedical exams and lab tests in many cases
By leveraging EHRs, life insurers can shorten underwriting timelines, minimize delays, and rely less on fragmented or outdated information sources. Together, advances in technology and regulation could help the industry improve efficiency and respond to rising policyholder expectations.
*The term Electronic Health Record (EHR) is often used interchangeably with Electronic Medical Record (EMR). However, an EMR generally captures information from a single provider or data source, whereas EHRs are more comprehensive, designed to be used by multiple care providers and be interoperable across different systems.Looking ahead: Practical implications
As legislation, such as Bill S‑5, begins to break down data silos, underwriters have the opportunity to access applicant health information more quickly and with fewer gaps. Improved interoperability could reduce redundant testing and paperwork, accelerate medical evidence collection, and support stronger risk assessment by making relevant records available sooner.
In recent years, Munich Re, Canada (Life) has worked with several organizations to enable the use of digital medical data, such as historical laboratory results and prescription histories, in Canadian underwriting. Bill S‑5 is important because it is intended to improve interoperability and reduce barriers to lawful data sharing. If implemented effectively, it could support more consistent retrieval of third-party evidence with less manual effort. However, the bill does not create unfettered access to health information; disclosure would still remain subject to applicant consent, privacy laws, and provincial health-information rules.
Bill S‑5 is still progressing through Parliament and, as of April 2026, had completed Senate committee review but had not yet reached the House of Commons. Life insurers should closely monitor regulatory consultations, as this legislation may bring about systemic changes affecting how underwriters access and assess risk-related information. EHRs will be instrumental in this evolution, helping the industry move beyond the limitations of the APS toward a more digital, streamlined future.
Munich Re will continue to closely monitor all developments on this important topic and will provide updates as they occur.
References
Contact the author